How Do You Spell Holiday?

Torching the Record: notes on Montreal’s Olympic Legacy

“In 1977, Mayor Drapeau gave birth to a beautiful baby boy.”
—Mike Meyers, Canada

On 5 February 1976, the front page of Montréal-Matin featured the grisly story of three men, Yvon Duchesne, Guy Montreuil, and his brother Jean-Pierre, who were found criminally responsible for a double murder that took place at Le Dôme nightclub on Sherbrooke Street on 10 January.

The killings were framed as part of a larger violent crime spree that began plaguing Montreal in the mid-1970s and was often associated with the city’s nighttime culture. Montreal’s reputation was growing internationally as a disco-dancing destination, second only to New York City. But the city’s vibrant nightlife also implicated drugs and sexual deviance, antagonisms to a squeaky-clean civic image.

Two trans women employed in nightclubs as “female impersonators” were stabbed to death in a St. Leonard apartment on New Year’s Eve, swelling Montreal’s 1975 murder toll to a record 110. And Jean-Pierre Montreuil had apparently been canvassing Le Dôme’s clientele for rolling papers prior to shooting Ronald Turcol, the doorman, and a 28-year-old customer, Nelson Dodier, who had attempted to prevent him from leaving after Montreuil smoked a joint in the bathroom.

Also visible on Montréal-Matin’s front page is the iconic M-for-Montreal Olympic logo designed by the graphic artist Georges Huel, a personal friend of then-mayor Jean Drapeau. Doubtless, Drapeau begrudged the juxtaposition of gruesome headlines alongside the forthcoming Olympic Games that he viewed as part of his legacy to vault Montreal onto the podium of prestigious cosmopolitan cities. Increased policing of the city’s nightlife ensued with especially harsh suppression of Montreal’s queer and unhoused populations.

A cartoon depicting an Olympic security guard with a helmet and weapon, speaking to a police officer. The guard has a humorous expression, and above them are the words 'OLYMPIC SECURITY' and 'BE DISCREET'.
Aislin, Olympic Security: Be Discreet, The Montreal Gazette, 6 May 1976. Photographed for NicheMTL.

Still, subduing the underground is just one of the underlying currents of Montreal 1976: An Olympic Feat, an impressive exhibition that opened this week at the McCord Stewart Museum.

Superficially, the show marks the 50th anniversary of Montreal hosting the Olympic Games. But the McCord Stewart’s assemblage of remarkable objects speaks less to nostalgia, metropolitan jingoism, or sport, and focusses more upon the aesthetic and political aspects of mounting the Olympics here — which is the far more interesting story. And neither does it pull any punches in its criticism of the hypocrisy, corruption, and cultural violence that swirled around the city at the time, and their reverberations today.

An extensive editorial cartoon collection from contemporaneous newspapers anchors Montreal 1976 and acts as an instructive historical throughline. While the topical humour is not immediately obvious to a generation that was not yet born in 1976, the sheer volume and acridity of satire that the Olympics produced is evidence of concurrent popular sentiment toward the Games.

A black and white photograph featuring a man and a woman standing in the street, each holding Olympic torches pointing towards each other. Both are dressed in casual athletic outfits, and there are buildings and cars in the background.
Exhibition view of Montreal 1976: An Olympic Feat. Photographed for NicheMTL.

The Oxford Olympics Study of 2016 found that Montreal’s was the highest cost overrun — at a staggering 720 percent — for any Olympic Games in modern history. “The Montreal Olympics can no more have a deficit than a man can have a baby,” Drapeau told the CBC in 1973. But by 1974, a full two years before any medals would be awarded, The Montreal Gazette’s Aislin was parodying what the city already knew with a caricature of a pregnant Drapeau on the phone to the abortion rights activist Henry Morgentaler.

According to the Oxford study, the Games cost about $6.1 billion adjusted for 2016 inflation, an average of $1 million per athlete. It would take Montreal more than 30 years to pay off the debt incurred, lending the Olympic Stadium its “Big Owe” nickname and inspiring some questionable strategies to raise the funds.

Among them was the extension and increase in the late 1980s of a special tax on cigarettes, capitalizing on Montreal’s repute as North America’s ashtray. It is toxic irony that encouraging tobacco consumption mitigated the government’s fiscal hangover for the advancement of sport.

A monochromatic illustration depicting two hands: one holding a cigarette and the other poised above an architectural model resembling a stadium.
R. Pier, Quebec Government extends and increases special tobacco tax to continue paying off deficit from 1976 Montreal Olympic Games, Le Journal de Montreal, 1988. Photographed for NicheMTL.

The McCord Stewart exhibition also highlights the sartorial and graphic elements that helped to identify the Olympics, featuring posters designed by Michael Snow, François Dallaire and Clermont Malenfant, and the famous marijuana button-emblazoned jean jacket conceived by Raymond Bellemare.

A display of costumes that the officials wore, as well as Radio-Canada’s loud outerwear, is a rich time capsule of kitschy mid-1970s trends and offers a yardstick against which to measure fashion’s cyclical inclinations. A blue t-shirt and white wide-legged rainbow-belted pant combination would not look out of place on today’s runway.

A display of a blue Olympics-themed t-shirt and white flared pants, showcased on a mannequin in a museum setting, with colorful garments in the background.
Exhibition view of Montreal 1976: An Olympic Feat. Photographed for NicheMTL.

While visual art was lauded for branding the Games, another scandal that would come to be considered the worst occurrence of art censorship in Canadian history tarnished the Olympics. The Corridart dans la rue Sherbrooke, a public installation of 22 juried artworks stretching from Atwater to Pie IX, was organized by the artist-architect Melvin Charney and coordinated by André Ménard of the Arts and Culture program of the Comité organisateur des jeux olympiques. A grant for $386,000 from the Ministère des Affaires culturelles du Québec provided funding.

Corridart was conceived to showcase works from prominent local artists including Françoise Sullivan and Pierre Ayot, and an open call to all Quebec artists received more than 300 submissions. A vernissage at the UQAM gallery was held on 7 July 1976 to celebrate Corridart’s opening, and the installation was scheduled to be on display until the 31st.

However, a number of the artworks were vandalized and several artists whose works were not included in the exhibition staged public protests against the granting process. Mayor Drapeau on 13 July ordered the exhibition to be dismantled and most of the pieces were damaged or destroyed.

A pair of old-fashioned phone booths next to a street, with hiking backpacks placed on the ground nearby. A sign on a pole is partially visible, and a gas station can be seen in the background under a cloudy sky.
The Teletron, Michael Haslam, 1976. Archives de la Ville de Montréal / VM94-EM0750-001.

Officially, Drapeau cited public safety. But many of the works contained veiled allegations against the government and alluded to outright corruption. Michael Haslam’s installation entitled The Teletron, for instance, consisted of a series of telephone booths that were programmed to play prerecorded messages — among them financial figures for how much the Games cost and speculation over where the money was actually going.

In the wake of the Corridart fracas, a dozen artists filed a civil lawsuit against the City of Montreal for $350,000. Litigation lasted more than a decade and resulted in a settlement in 1988 awarding each artist a paltry $3,000.

A woman in a flowing white dress stands still, holding a bowl, while a blurred figure in red shorts appears to be running past her. The text 'Montréal 1976' is displayed at the top.
Olympic Flame, 1975, François Dallaire & Clermont Malenfant. Photographed for NicheMTL.

The McCord Stewart exhibition ultimately tells a story of the 1976 Summer Olympics in which sport is a supporting actor in the Games’ sociocultural cast. Selling Montreal on the world stage came at an astronomical cost and arguably benefited the political players of the day more than the athletes or the public who cheered them on. A cruel twist is that Canada was shut out of the Gold Medal category for the competition’s entirety, the only host country in the Olympic record to do so.

There are elements to Montreal 1976 that will appeal to sports-lovers and families, tourists and casual cultural observers. But the McCord Stewart collection is delightfully nuanced, paying tribute to our history by offering an unvarnished and still-under-construction Olympic vision that honours Montreal’s complex and contradictory character.

Commemorating a half-century of the city’s Olympic legacy should celebrate both the highs and lows, recounting the crackdowns on nightlife and the destruction of important works of art, the corruption and cronyism, alongside the glory of victory.◼︎

Montreal 1976: An Olympic Feat runs through 7 September 2026 at McCord Stewart Museum, 690 Sherbrooke Street West.

Cover image: Gallery view of Montreal 1976: An Olympic Feat. Photographed for NicheMTL.

Standard
Play Recent

Monkey Warfare

No Hay Banda, BEAM SPLITTER with Anne-F Jacques & Ryoko Akama, La Sala Rossa, 29 September 2025

Anne-F Jacques & Ryoko Akama perform for No Hay Banda’s 10th season premiereat La Sala Rossa, 29 September 2025. Photographed for NicheMTL.

The 2006 Canadian film Monkey Warfare, starring the Torontonian writer-director Don McKellar and his late partner Tracy Wright, centres on an ageing couple of radical political militants who spend their days smoking pot, listening to The Fugs, foraging for antiques to peddle online, and ruminating over their heyday committing soft acts of left-wing domestic terrorism.

Paul Thomas Anderson’s most recent feature, One Battle After Another, displays remarkable similarities to McKellar’s film: handlebar-moustached male leads with flawed personalities and difficulties maintaining relationships; attempting to outrun previous misdeeds; the hope bestowed upon a new generation of notably female operatives.

Although their politics align, these films’ ultimate morals could not be further apart. The necessity of violence is the definitive subject at the heart of every revolution.

Don Giovanni, Opéra de Montréal, Salle Wilfrid Pelletier, 30 September 2025

The cast of Don Giovanni take a bow at Salle Wilfrid Pelletier, 30 September 2025. Photographed for NicheMTL.

“…the more consciousness a man possesses the more he is separated from his instincts (which at least give him an inkling of the hidden wisdom of God) and the more prone he is to error. He is certainly not up to Satan’s wiles if even his creator is unable, or unwilling, to restrain this powerful spirit.” —Carl Jung, Answer to Job.

We are constantly at war — evidently with each other, but more frequently with ourselves. We fight to resist our base impulses. We struggle to transcend our animal instincts and become human. Foregoing indulgences and pleasures of the flesh is an archetypal fight. It is not only a moral but furthermore an existential conflict. We battle our inner demons which seek to lead us astray from the straight and narrow path.

Consciousness, then, is an archetypal paradox: consciousness is necessary to discern the difference between what is wrong and what is right; but it is also consciousness that sensibly represses nature’s divine intelligence.

POP Montreal presents Do Make Say Think with Kee Avil, Rialto Theatre, 28 September 2025

Patrons spill out onto the street to perform a “Cellphone Symphony” following Do Make Say Think at the Rialto Theatre, 28 September 2025. Photographed for NicheMTL.

The problem of why we repeat is a fundamental philosophical question. Once something is done, why bother to do it again?

There are a number of answers, including, but not limited to, compulsion, addiction, and inevitability.

I might be compelled, say, to have lunch even though I had lunch yesterday because food keeps me alive and I love life. I might drink a cup of coffee even though I drank a cup of coffee a few hours ago because caffeine is a habit-forming substance and I am a creature of habit. I might go out to see a beloved band perform again even though I have seen them perform before because I am opportunistic and cannot avoid exploiting any occasion to do so.

Our impulse to repeat is at odds, though, with the longing for novelty and the desire for freshness of experience. And so, we disguise our repetitions. We have a ham sandwich for lunch today because we had a tuna fish sandwich yesterday. We order an espresso in the morning and an allongé in the afternoon. And our favourite bands subtly alter our favourite songs in order to inject them with a sense of surprise, even though we know very well the verse and the chorus.

“We do not disguise because we repress,” writes Gilles Deleuze in Difference and Repetition, “we repress because we disguise, and we disguise by virtue of the determinant centre of repetition.”

Ensemble Urbain, Origines, La Sala Rossa, 21 September 2025

Ensemble Urbain perform at La Sala Rossa, 21 September 2025. Photographed for NicheMTL.

I have often wondered why, if there is so much vacant space in the world, people feel the need to occupy the same zone.

Humans congregate in cities like magnets draw metal shavings. Everyone wants to live in Paris or London or Berlin or Moscow or Montreal. Fewer people are drawn to Saint-Joseph-de-Sorel.

“New York City,” said the departed comedian Phil Hartman, “is a testament to man’s desire to be stacked on top of other men.”

Africa Fashion, McCord Steward Museum, 25 September 2025 – 1 February 2026

Dr. Christine Checinska introduces Africa Fashion at the McCord Stewart Museum, 24 September 2025. Photographed for NicheMTL.

A fool’s mouth is his destruction, and his lips are the snare of his soul. —Proverbs 19:7

Beauty, wisdom, virtue, justice, and truth seem to be the predominant preoccupations of the world’s religious doctrines.

About a decade ago, we entered into an historical era that the media dubbed “post-Truth,” in which objective facts took a supporting role to individual opinions and emotional appeals. This new epoch coincided with the first election of the Orange Cheeto in the United States and Britain’s exit from the European Union across the pond.

The universality of truth is implied by its most frequently used form, in the singular. We don’t instruct our children to tell multiple truths. Rather, we implore them to tell the truth. One.

Conversely, falsehoods are plural. Lies. Practically infinite iterations.

Monotheism is the creed that there is only one God. The concept developed in opposition to polytheism in which adherents worshiped multiple deities that governed various aspects of nature and reality. The term originates from the mid-1600s when Henry More, the English theologian, devised it to designate preferential religions and reject substance dualism.

In the 21st century, we tend to perceive and interpret reality through a series of interconnected actors, actants, and networks. This perception encourages an assumption of complexity that the understanding of a singular truth bypasses entirely. The austerity of one truth, one God, and one administration of justice has an inherent and minimal beauty to it. But it does not reflect the structure of the organic world around us, and particularly the world we have constructed.

Multiplicity characterizes technological postmodernity and diversity represents biological fortitude. Both of those assertions are observably true — and they seemingly contradict the world’s religious doctrines.

The notion of multiple truths presupposes that facts are a little different for everyone, like a universal version of Rashomon. Reality has apparently bifurcated exponentially since the turn of the millennium, and those divisions have accelerated following Trump, Covid, and Trump 2.0.

Are we never ever getting back together?◼︎

Thank you for inviting NicheMTL to your thing. Please get in touch at the about page.

NicheMTL is Montreal’s independent not-for-profit source for this city’s most niche arts and culture. If you love what you’re reading, please consider buying a yearbook and subscribing.

Cover image: Gallery view of Elvis, part of Africa Fashion at the McCord Stewart Museum. Photographed for NicheMTL.

Standard