All Dressed

Elegantly Wasted: in conversation with Dexter Barker-Glenn

In his essay “Spectacles of Waste,” the urban scholar William Straw highlights the method of “rhythmanalysis,” a field of study that the sociologist Henri Lefebvre outlined to focus attention upon the vitality of cultural forms and their passage through time.

The urban environment is a space for stasis and perpetual motion, oscillating constantly between immovability and change. Infrastructure is the most visible example of an urban characteristic that evolves extremely slowly, whereas the traffic that flows within infrastructures represents a comparatively faster rhythmic and circulatory phenomenon. Cities forge specific relationships to temporality in which objects persist or pass away.

“The rapid turnover of things and ideas and the concomitant erasure of historical sensibility have long been diagnosed as defining features of urban life,” Straw writes. Put simply, cities tend to accelerate cultural rhythms.

Measuring the vitality of metropolitan life is concurrently one of contemporary art’s tasks. The nowness of artworks determines their currency amidst ever changing communities that assign monetary value and cultural heft to them. Yet, in their material immutability, enduring long after the ideas that they convey or the traditions within which they belong fall out of fashion, artworks often irritate the impetus to define the immediacy of the urban moment.

The work of the young artist Dexter Barker-Glenn exemplifies this tension between slowness and speed, urban rhythms and artistic revolutions.

“I’m interested in the weathering of objects.” Dexter Barker-Glenn.

“I feel really light and alive when I’m working with material that has a history,” says Barker-Glenn, offering me a tour of his latest exhibition, First Water, installed in the second room at Centre Clark.

“I’m interested in the weathering of objects. It’s the most interesting part of them, and I’m just drawing attention to that, in a way. I hope that it makes people excited about the world around them and that it’s inspiring to see. I think that the real art is the objects. Like these banners,” he says, gesturing toward a sun-faded commercial sign depicting a blue diamond that he has appropriated, perforated, and stretched like a cinema screen in the middle of the room.

“There’s a condensing that’s happening in this piece. I am doing something to these objects when I make them an art piece and put them into a gallery.”

In this exhibition, too, is a striking mosaic composed exclusively of dead flies glued to the wall in a sunburst pattern. The flies form a gradient of colour, fading from black to white as they approach the center of the configuration. A replica of a dead deer stitched from remnants of the diamond banner sits lifeless on the floor beneath the fly arrangement, an oblique reference to Iphigenia, who in Greek mythology was sacrificed to atone for her father Agamemnon’s ill-conceived hunting expedition.

“There’s this desire that capitalism has to keep on growing and accumulate energy.” Gallery views of Dexter Barker-Glenn’s First Water photographed for NicheMTL

What Barker-Glenn is doing is at once naïve and brilliant: transforming trash into treasure; elevating waste within this reverential space; taking readymade objects and redesignating them as works of art; and using the commodity that the central image signifies — a diamond — to comment upon capital, extravagance, and the deep-temporal vitality of material life cycles.

“This image of a diamond is trying to be permanent,” Barker-Glenn muses. “The image of the diamond is pretending to be a diamond. It’s serving a certain job as an image. But its materiality fails at that goal.”

I first met Barker-Glenn in 2024 at Ateliers Belleville where he occupied a small studio space and was working at that time on a series of 3D-sculpted friezes constructed from layers upon layers of spent lottery scratchcards. The hyper-specificity of this project intrigued me, as did its singular aesthetic qualities. “There’s this desire that capitalism has to keep on growing and accumulate energy,” believes Barker-Glenn.

It was imperative to him that he source each used lottery scratchcard through a process of bartering, with local depanneurs eventually offering boxes of them to him for free when he told them what they would be used for. “It was quite easy to get them to give them to me,” he recalls. “Often they were forgotten.”

He also acquired the diamond banner by agreeing to hand-paint a new sign for the shop’s proprietor. “I had them for a while in my studio and was quite intimidated by them,” he tells me. “But I was confident that they were important images.”

The more I consider them, the more meaning these objects accrue. The random value of any individual scratchcard, or banner, whether it is successful or a failure, stands in for an entire ecosystem of paper money in which one bill is absurdly worth more or less than another.

Ultimately, belief is what undergirds this system, an agreement to act as if stacks of paper have intrinsic significance. Yet, we have progressively been moving through an era where disbelief and disagreement characterize post-capitalist aspiration, in which chance dictates fortunes as much as traditional measures of value — like labour, or quantity, or quality, or demand.

A person with curly hair stands in front of a large artwork featuring a stylized diamond design in shades of purple and white.
“I’m interested in these places where these seemingly non-material systems are material and have waste.” Dexter Barker-Glenn photographed for NicheMTL.

Barker-Glenn relocated to Montreal from Toronto in 2017 at the age of 17 to study studio arts with a minor in computer science at Concordia University. “I kind of had thought that computer science would be a good career choice,” he says, “to learn about coding. But I’ve never done a coding job. A lot of it now is pretty redundant. A.I. stuff has taken over.”

Barker-Glenn’s work, shuttling restlessly among the disciplines of painting, sculpture, and process art, appears least like anything that Artificial Intelligence could reproduce. “My next project is actually kind of about A.I.,” he reveals. “It’s about data centres and the environmental impact that is hidden away from us. A.I. seems free to use. I’m interested in these places where these seemingly non-material systems are material and have waste.”

Barker-Glenn’s diamond banner similarly fluctuates between useful and useless, functional and junk. Indeed, art-writ-large is identified now more than ever as non-functional production, labour divorced from use value, matter void of purpose.

A person with medium-length hair is holding a coffee cup and looking surprised while sitting at a wooden table in a modern indoor setting.
“I don’t think of my art as functional.” Dexter Barker-Glenn photographed for NicheMTL.

“Art often serves an economy,” explains Barker-Glenn. “But something is art when it’s not functional anymore. It’s like a tumor of wealth or something. Some form of art always serves a purpose in an economic system. But I don’t think of my art as functional. When it’s art, it becomes an object that’s thought of as holding currency, and when it’s waste, it’s thought of as damage to the environment. It becomes a waste product. It’s interesting to think about materials in this way.”

The political theorist Jane Bennett recasts agency as a network comprised of human and non-human material in her 2010 book, Vibrant Matter. “It seems that the appropriate unit of analysis for democratic theory is neither the individual human nor an exclusively human collective,” Bennett argues, “but the (ontologically heterogenous) ‘public’ coalescing around a problem.” That problem today, as it has been since the emergence of authority, is power and its arbitrary rhythms.

A philosophical undercurrent runs beneath Barker-Glenn’s work, one that ultimately unites Bennett’s and Straw’s political economy. “I’m very fascinated with how waste connects economic systems with ecological systems,” he tells me.

“There’s lots of ways that technology is used to make it seem like we’ve moved forward, politically,” Barker-Glenn observes. “But it’s all threats of violence that are obscured through these systems. There’s a threat of violence that’s maintaining it all.”◼︎

First Water by Dexter Barker-Glenn continues through 28 February 2026 at Centre Clark, 5455 Av. de Gaspé #114.

Cover image: Dexter Barker-Glenn at Centre Clark photographed for NicheMTL.

Standard
All Dressed

Into The Abyss: in conversation with Andréanne Godin

Drying atop a desk in the artist Andréanne Godin’s studio on Rue Chabanel are three identical garden trowels, replicas fashioned in matte grey clay.

The original object, a utilitarian version with silver metallic blade and an orange and black handle, is placed nearby, apparently for comparison. These facsimiles of an everyday tool one uses to dig into the earth are indicative of Godin’s artistic process, one moored by a preoccupation with revealing what exists below the surface.

Dressed in dark Levis denims and a pair of grey sneakers, Godin has invited me round for a studio visit, and a candid and sprawling conversation. She has made us a pot of black tea which she serves with homemade candied ginger and spoonfuls of honey.

“I thought maybe, I understood maybe.”

Godin will spend the next two months as artist-in-residence at Fondation Molinari’s central gallery to create works intended to “resonate with those in the Foundation’s collections,” according to the press release, culminating in a springtime exhibition opening 12 March 2026.

“I thought maybe, I understood maybe,” Godin says hesitantly when I ask her what will come of the residency. “I want to create monochromes that will be big enough to occupy your whole vision when you stand at a certain distance from them. I don’t know if that’s what I’m going to be able to do. But that’s what I want to do.”

At a time when artists of all stripes appear obsessed with the concept of “immersion,” here is one that literally plunges headlong into her work. In the fall of 2024, Godin learned how to freedive and became interested in the ways that we perceive colour while submerged underwater.

Her most recent exhibition entitled 48.312403, -78.048948, presented late last year at Galerie Nicolas Robert, produced among other items a series of wild clay pastel sticks that Godin gathered while freediving at lakes within Quebec’s Abitibi region. She shows me several wooden pallets that were specially constructed to display the pastels, and a handmade chart of colour samples with meticulous marginal notes.

“I could just think that I was going to be surrounded by a colour that you won’t really be able to see.”

“I never really dove in a lake before with my eyes open,” Godin reveals. “It’s an experience that must be very close to meditation. I could just think that I was going to be surrounded by a colour that you won’t really be able to see. But you’re going to see something. I was thinking of certain pieces of Molinari, like Les Trapèze. They’re not stripes. But there’s something organized on the space.”

Godin exhaustively catalogued every detail of what she saw at various depths with microtonal shades of colour that she gleaned from those dives. She began by testing different ways of layering and saturating the colours on paper, creating a shimmering and vibrational optical effect.

“In red it works less,” she explains. “In yellow, I feel that it really works well.” Godin pulls out a large sketchpad and thumbs through it. “I’m going to start by filling these 30 pages with monochromes created out of different layers of all these different colours,” she tells me.

“I feel like everything’s up in the air.”

Godin, 41, grew up in Val-d’Or and moved to Montreal in 2007, obtaining a Master of Fine Arts in Fibres at Concordia University. “The first time I went in an art museum, I was 17,” she says. “I was in CEGEP. But I had already decided that that’s what I wanted to do. I remember being a kid, being five, and wanting to be an artist. The only thing I liked to do was drawing.”

The prestigious Galerie Nicolas Robert has presented Godin’s work for more than a decade, and she has exhibited a number of times there, as well as at Axenéo7 in Gatineau, and Oboro in Montreal, among others. She has held local and international residencies previously, most notably at the Christoph Merian Foundation artist’s studio in Basel, Switzerland, in 2017, and at the Josef & Anni Albers Foundation in Bethany, Connecticut, the previous year.

This past December, Godin was appointed Assistant Professor in the discipline of Image Experimentation at Université Laval, so throughout the next season, she will split her time between a new teaching job and her research-creation residency at Fondation Molinari. “I feel like you get back the energy you put out into the universe, and maybe I put out a little too much energy,” she laughs. “I feel like everything’s up in the air.”

We talk at length about her earliest transcendent encounters, those which started Godin on the path to her current artistic practice. “My youth was very related to enjoying nature,” she says. “I think that’s why now in my work it’s so related to outdoor experiences. Even for this project at Molinari, when I thought about my relationship to landscape, it’s always been the forest.”

Et là, nous marchâmes… | And there, we walked…, 2014-2015, (Detail), Porcelain, sculpted natural graphite, wall drawing, Variable dimensions. Photographed for NicheMTL.

Godin recalls vivid childhood memories of blueberry-picking excursions with her father — memories that translated into a sculptural installation called And There, We Walked…, which she exhibited at Nicolas Robert in 2015. The work consists of a porcelain basket filled with blueberries fashioned from natural graphite. The tiny graphite blueberry sculptures become tools in the exhibition to create immense, impressionistic wall drawings.

“I love sculpture,” says Godin, showing me the basket, still half-full of shiny black blueberries. “But I was just thinking, ‘man, I don’t know where to put these things.’ Whenever I make sculptures, they’re usually really small, because I don’t want to have to store them. I love that drawings don’t take up a lot of space, but also somehow take up space,” she says, unfurling a thick paper scroll containing one of the drawings. Her studio transforms into a makeshift art exhibition strewn with random examples from her vast oeuvre.

“I was always working in black and white and then I started to work with monochromes. So, for me, it was just an easy transition. One colour. It was the same thing as working in black and white, even if it was all blue or all red. When you teach it, you have to understand colour at another level. Trying to figure out ways of communicating colour, or impressions, or feelings that I had when I was diving, it’s a very humbling experience. It feels like being in the service of nature.”

Nature, I propose to Godin, is something like the opposite of art: objects self-organize naturally, in contrast to being organized with effort by an artist’s intelligence and intuition.

“I do think that nature organizes things in a way that somehow, if you’re sensitive, or if you stop for a second and look at how it organizes things, can teach you so much about how to organize things in a gallery. What is the relationship with your body as you approach this thing?”

“This idea of being surrounded and touched by colour is different than the idea of seeing it.”

In The World of Perception, the book by Maurice Merleau-Ponty, he writes that, “the things of the world are not simply neutral objects which stand before us for our contemplation […] people’s tastes, character, and the attitude they adopt to the world and to particular things can be deciphered from the objects with which they choose to surround themselves, their preferences for certain colours, or the places where they like to go for walks.”

Evidently, a sustained contemplation of perception colours every object that Godin makes — from sculpture, to drawing, to candied ginger. The ways that Godin senses and reflects and reorganizes the objects in her world reveal what is unseen beneath our own surfaces, just as the shades of clay she trowels from lake beds expose the earth’s intrinsic character. Nonetheless, it is the whimsical hue of experience that seems to motivate her most.

“I’ve always loved closing your eyes and being in the sun and seeing that red,” she muses. “Feeling that you’re embraced. And at night, seeing all of the sparkles when you close your eyes. That’s also fun. This idea of being surrounded and touched by colour is different than the idea of seeing it. It feels like you can touch it somehow.”◼︎

Andréanne Godin is Fondation Molinari’s 2026 Artist-in-Residence.

Cover image: 48.312403, -78.048948, Detail. All images photographed for NicheMTL.

Standard
Play Recent

Objets Trouvés

Opéra de Montréal, The Barber of Seville rehearsal, 18 September 2024

The cast of The Barber of Seville rehearse at Place des Arts Salle E, 18 September 2024. Photographed for NicheMTL.

Voices achieve a new level of authority when they combine together in harmony.

I become consciously aware of this whenever I am witness to people singing together — in a choir, or as I was for a spirited rehearsal of The Opéra de Montréal’s forthcoming season opener, The Barber of Seville, staged for members of the press earlier this week.

Of course, operatic roles require powerful individual singers. But operas reach a whole nother plateau when they combine those dynamic individuals into an ensemble cast.

“The challenge,” explains OdeM’s artistic director Michel Beaulac, “is to find all the right pieces in the vocal puzzle. Once you have that puzzle together, you know you have the right production that will be pleasing to your audience.”

Pascale Girardin, Presence and Digressions, Projet Casa, 18 September – 8 October 2024

Gallery view, Pascale Girardin, Presence and Digressions, Projet Casa, 18 September 2024. Photographed for NicheMTL.

The ceramicist Pascale Girardin says that the physical gestures of maneuvering the large-scale terra cotta objects she created for her latest exhibition at Projet Casa bestowed upon her a feeling of belonging, “the sensation of embracing a comforting figure.”

Mankind is made of muscle, blood, and mud.

Jeremy Shaw, Localize Affect, 19 September – 2 November 2024, Bradley Ertaskiran

Jeremy Shaw, Untitled (There in Spirit) (2024), Bradley Ertaskiran, 19 September 2024. Photographed for NicheMTL.

Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on a hill cannot be hid. Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick, and it giveth light unto all that are in the house. Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven. —Matthew 5:14-16.

The affective outcome of online interactions is no less affective than meatspace interactions. If someone “likes” you online, it sends the same pleasure chemicals to your brain as if they gave you a compliment in the real world; if someone insults you in the comments section, it makes your blood boil just as much as it would if they were to do it to your face.

It stands to reason that this would change our real-world interactions, too, beginning to act toward one another as if screens separated us. The screen is the most effective affective tool of communication, and affective manipulation is the most effective method of social control.

Simon Petepiece, Clearing Corridor Chamber Cave, Galerie Nicolas Robert, 13 September – 26 October 2024

Simon Petepiece at the Clearing Corridor Chamber Cave vernissage, Galerie Nicolas Robert, 13 September 2024. Photographed for NicheMTL.

“How do you know who your daddy is? Because your mama told you so.” –Bill Broussard, JFK (1991)

David Cronenberg’s 1999 film eXistenZ centers on Allegra Geller, a renowned designer of virtual reality video games who becomes the target of a group of terrorists seeking to destroy her latest creation, an immersive game called “eXistenZ.” In it, players slip seamlessly between the real and virtual worlds to such a degree that the borders between truth and simulation blur.

The terrorists who pursue Geller charge that her games and others like them are the root cause for a dangerous societal turn against reality.

The film is science fiction, to be sure. But it is an increasingly accurate metaphor for the state of media today: from behind a screen, it is almost impossible to tell whether or not we are “in the game.”

André Turpin & Léa-Valérie Létourneau, Clusters, Centre PHI, 20 September – 20 October 2024

André Turpin & Léa-Valérie Létourneau at the Clusters vernissage, Centre PHI, 20 September 2024. Photographed for NicheMTL.

We love to think, as human beings, that we are in total control. Of our situations, of our environment, of ourselves, and even of one another.

In classical cinema studies, there are two general approaches that have historically shaped film analysis.

One is auteur theory, which presupposes that directors possess some kind of rarefied genius and produce works of singular vision.

Consequently, filmmakers like Alfred Hitchcock, Stanley Kubrick, or Martin Scorsese made movies that were manifestations of their own unique perspectives on reality.

It is true that these examples suggest some measure of authorial control. Hitchcock no doubt made Hitchcockian films. And there are certain aesthetic and thematic hallmarks of a Kubrick or a Scorsese production.

Bureau de Stephan Skoda (Cluster 1, 2020), André Turpin & Léa-Valérie Létourneau, Centre PHI. Photographed for NicheMTL.

Another less popular approach, but which I believe is closer to the truth, is what the critic Thomas Schatz in his book The Genius of the System called “the whole equation of pictures.”

Schatz argued that movies were made efficiently and effectively by the well-oiled machinery of an entire studio system, especially in the early days of Hollywood. Everyone — from the director on down to the script supervisor, the costumer, even the electrician — played an integral role in the look and feel of every picture.

In philosophy, these collections of people, objects, and ideas are called assemblages. Assemblages exert their own sort of agency. They manifest situations and bring events into being.

Assemblage theory ascribes power to complexity, favouring collectivity over individual agency, recognizing the limitations of a purely anthropocentric worldview. Focussing upon assemblages also complicates the notion of temporality, making it impossible to circumscribe events within time.

Phoebe Greenberg, André Turpin, and Denis Villeneuve at the Clusters vernissage, Centre PHI, 20 September 2024. Photographed for NicheMTL.

A film may be finished in a manner of speaking when it reaches the end of its production schedule, when it leaves the editing room and is presented onscreen. But a film embarks upon another life when it enters into various discursive assemblages. A film changes with its historical context, for instance, or in relation to audiences, in relation to other films, other works of art, other things that are not art.

In this way, there is no such thing as pure completion. An auteur may have a singular vision, but that vision is never fully realized, because visions themselves continue evolving within novel agentic assemblages.

The team of filmmaker André Turpin and art director Léa-Valérie Létourneau invoke the assemblage’s inherent agency in Clusters, their collaborative photographic exhibition on view at Centre PHI. By examining and calling attention to multiplicity, they also acknowledge the potentially infinite possibility in creating works of art.

“It’s really like a film you’re editing,” Turpin says.

“In teamwork, there’s always one person who is more convinced than the other. We’re never totally sure when a picture is finished.”◼︎

Thank you for inviting NicheMTL to your thing. Please get in touch at the about page.

NicheMTL is Montreal’s independent not-for-profit source for this city’s most niche arts and culture. If you love what you’re reading, please consider subscribing.

Cover image: Jeremy Shaw

Standard