Play Recent

After The Future

Jan Jelinek with Roméo Poirier and Racine, Society for Arts and Technology, 15 November 2024

Racine performs at SAT, 15 November 2024. Photographed for NicheMTL.

“From now on there can be no unpolitical prophecies.”
—John Berger, “The Moment of Cubism.”

In 2016, when Donald Trump was for the first time elected U.S. president, the online discourse-o-sphere kicked into overdrive with comparisons to various dystopian narratives, both historical and fictional.

Political theorists like Henry A. Giroux and Robert Paxton cited similarities to the unholy trinity of World War II-era fascist dictators. The New Yorker cartoonist Paul Noth likened Trump to the archetypal wolf tending his flock of sheep.

But none was as pervasive as Trump’s apparent correlation to Biff Tannen in Back to the Future Part II, leading the 1989 film’s screenwriter, Bob Gale, to confirm that he indeed modelled Tannen’s character on a caricature of Trump.

However, the blowhard billionaire archetype is no longer an exaggeration, nor does its application implicitly affront Trump or his supporters.

On the contrary, a loudmouthed misogynistic bully who appears impervious to criticism is the epitome of heroism for the new generation of disaffected and desensitized Americans who voted for him. Scorn only empowers them further; shame, paradoxically, is their badge of honour.

These incongruities have led many of us to observe, like the Back to the Future sequel’s plot, that we are living in the worst of conceivable timelines. But I’m afraid that it’s even worse than that: we’re going through the worst timeline again, like taking that pathological second whiff of a carton of spoilt milk.

This is Back to the Future Part II, part two.

NPNP with Anna Mayberry and Hidden Attachment, Lamplight, 14 November 2024

Listeners gather for NPNP’s “Harmony in a Vacuum” launch, 14 November 2024. Photographed for NicheMTL.

“Deception counts less as a measure of realism than as evidence of magicianship, and is a highly atypical mishap.”
—Nelson Goodman, Languages of Art

If works of art reflect the cultural zeitgeist, then we are clearly in a state of general disarray. Deconstructed music is only the latest structurally homologous current indicating the lack of structure and void of solidarity evident in society.

For instance, rigidly rhythmic electronic music of the 1980s and ‘90s fairly accurately echoed late modernity, the perfect and predictable thump-and-clap of the cybernetic age.

At the turn of the new millennium, arrhythmic trends exemplified by Autechre’s off-the-grid programming, and further, by Burial’s beat-mismatched hauntological loopscapes, anticipated the increasingly fragmented post-Fordist modes of production emerging under hypercapitalism.

Of all the 20th century musical inventions, the synthesizer sonically represented futurism best. But by the early 21st century, it had quickly flipped into an instrument of nostalgia, reminding us of the squandered potential of possible futures past.

Now, in an era of heightened precarity, remote and always-on labour, forever wars and forever chemicals, we are confronted with alienating and longform musical (de)compositions that reject almost any semblance of structure, and in which moments of traditional melody and chance harmony are at best incidental.

The recto of this verso is the retromaniacal return to thinner and thinner slivers of musical historicity, reliving, repeating, and recombining ever-shrinking aesthetic precedents in a rapidly decaying orbit, reducing entire cultural currents and oeuvres to a “vibe” or a “mood.”

This is neither a good nor a bad thing — but it is undisputedly nonetheless a thing.

La grandiose Symphonie alpestre de Richard Strauss, Orchestre symphonique de Montréal, Bruce Liu Piano, Rafael Payare Conductor, Maison Symphonique, 13 November 2024

Bruce Liu performs with the OSM at Maison Symphonique, 13 November 2024. Antoine Saito for the OSM.

“The sense of inevitability that a great work of art projects is not made up of the inevitability or necessity of its parts, but of the whole.”
—Susan Sontag, “On Style.”

There are a handful of writers to whom I always return in troubled times, among them William S. Burroughs, Slavoj Žižek, Mark Fisher, Susan Sontag, and Woody Allen. All of these at alternating points in their lives experienced ecstasy and despair, the heights of fame and the trials of misfortune.

Burroughs, for example, murdered his own wife, ostensibly an accident from which his creative conscience likely never fully recovered. Woody Allen has now defiantly spent half of his career under the long shadow of popular cancellation. Fisher succumbed to his own diagnosis that there was no alternative to capitalism — other than the exceedingly unlikely possibility that we would all take psychedelics and fall madly in love with modernity again.

I make no claim for any of these thinkers, nor apologies for their misdeeds, nor explanations for their failures or successes. However, their words provide me a profound sense of comfort, a path forward, like sets of deep footprints in freshly fallen snow.

Russell Banx, Gaze and Gesture, Pangée, 14 November – 21 December 2024

Russell Banx, Across the Lake, 2024. Graphite on paper. 57 x 44 in. Photographed for NicheMTL.

“for God, to me, it seems,
is a verb
not a noun”
—R. Buckminster Fuller, “No More Secondhand God.”

My generation and every generation after it mainly fall into two problematic categories: those who were never taught how to fight, and those who were only taught how to fight.

The progeny of hippies were erroneously told that love would conquer all. This is false. Love in fact conquers very few things, not even love itself. Hatred is often stronger than love.

If conquering is the goal, the most valuable tool is violence. The trick is to fight lovingly, to commit violence with love.

Déliquescence, Fonderie Darling, 26 September – 8 December 2024

Installation view, Déliquescence, Fonderie Darling. Photographed for NicheMTL.

“God makes the world by calculating, but his calculations never work out exactly, and this inexactitude or injustice in the result, this irreducible inequality, forms the condition of the world.”
—Gilles Deleuze, Difference and Repetition

The work of art in the age of its artificial reproduction immediately raises the question of its authenticity. Can art conceived of and made by a complex computer program genuinely be called art? Or is the art perhaps the A.I. itself?

If it is, human beings are not the artists; God is. And all of creation is His, well, creation. We are not the medium but the form.

The opposite of artificial intelligence is not human intelligence but rather divine instinct.◼︎

Thank you for inviting NicheMTL to your thing. Please get in touch at the about page.

NicheMTL is Montreal’s independent not-for-profit source for this city’s most niche arts and culture. If you love what you’re reading, please consider subscribing.

Cover image: Russell Banx. Photographed for NicheMTL.

Standard
Play Recent

All Summer in a Day

Shunk with Ahren Strange and Checkmate Bullseye, 6482 Saint Laurent, 11 August 2024

Shunk performs at 6482 Saint Laurent, 11 August 2024. Photographed for NicheMTL.

Harmony is rather behind us than before. —Henri Bergson

I often think of those stereotypical pep talks that coaches give in the locker room when their team is down. Or the speech that generals make to their troops on the cusp of some important battle. Something like, “I’m not going to lie to you: you’re going to have to give this everything you’ve got — more that you ever dreamt of giving — and half of you ain’t coming back.”

I recite this speech to myself sometimes just for leaving the house.

It seems as if every quotidian operation these days has the potential to erupt into all-out war. And I hate to fight. But more than fighting, I hate to lose. Particularly in a battle I never asked for. Especially in a fight I did everything possible to avoid.

Adversity in life can strike at any time. Usually, it occurs when we least expect it, when we are least equipped to handle it, when our resistance is lowest. It’s as if the universe somehow knows when we’re down and picks that moment to kick. Then, we are faced with the choice to accept or reject it, to flee or to fight.

I propose that flight is no longer an option. There’s nowhere left to run. We are all living on the same planet, and when we are attacked where we stand, we have a duty to stand our ground. It is an obligation to defend ourselves. Because if we don’t, our attackers will attack again, and worse, they will move on to attack our neighbours, our friends, our family.

Survival is not a right. But surviving is your responsibility.

Rendez-vous sur l’Esplanade du Parc olympique, OSM, 14 August 2024

The OSM performs at l’Esplanade du Parc olympique, 14 August 2024. Antoine Saito for the Orchestre Symphonique de Montréal.

If I never saw the sunshine, baby,
Then maybe I wouldn’t mind the rain —The Ronettes

The TV adaptation of Ray Bradbury’s sad science fiction short story, All Summer in a Day, traumatized me as a youngster. I recall that we watched it in junior high school. And why kids at such a tender age should be exposed to this specific depressing chronicle is now becoming clearer to me.

In the original tale, which was published in 1954 in The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction, Venus is a planet beleaguered by constant rainstorms, with the sunshine only being visible for two hours every seven years.

The story centers on a class of Venusian children who finally get to see the sun for the first time, and an Earthling child named Margot, whom the cruel native Venusians lock in a closet, depriving her of the solar spectacle.

In the screen version, the director extends Venus’s sunless period from seven to nine years, presumably to punctuate the brutality of its moral. The ending is also altered when the children, apparently out of guilt, give Margot a bouquet of flowers that they gathered under the Venusian rays.

The message of this story is frequently interpreted simply that people behave with brutality towards those who are different from them, especially to immigrants, and towards those who have had enviable experiences. Margot came from Earth, where she routinely saw the sun, comparing its warmth to a fire in the stove.

But the underlying message is that we are compelled to behave with brutality to the great Other in order to understand the consequences of our brutal nature.

Nature is violent. When we strike out against it, nature strikes back.

Roundtable with Rito Joseph, Acouetey Junior Jocy and Leith Hamilton, Black Summer ’91, Fonderie Darling, 15 August 2024

From left: Leith Hamilton, Rito Joseph, and Acouetey Junior Jocy, Fonderie Darling 15 August 2024. Photographed for NicheMTL.

That which hath been is now; and that which is to be hath already been; and God requireth that which is past. —Ecclesiastes 3:15

The most powerful moment in an especially poignant symposium around Fonderie Darling’s Black Summer ’91 exhibition came when the civic leader Leith Hamilton admitted to the audience that competition within Montreal’s most marginalized communities had historically proven counterproductive.

Rivalry, for example, for grant money, or prestige, ultimately led to further rifts in already-divided communities, setting back the project of unifying and uplifting various diverse peoples within a system that colonialism and capitalism had already rigged against them.

Nothing is as useless as an angry peace activist. To arrive together we must walk together.

Fine Food Market with Nick Bendsza and Nikolas L.B., La Sotterenea, 16 August 2024

Nikolas L.B. performs at La Sotterenea, 16 August 2024. Photographed for NicheMTL.

All temporal goods are vanity and delusion; there must come a time when they are taken away and lost. —Solomon Ben Isaac Levi

Every time there’s an election, the familiar chorus through the campaign bluster is always the word “change.” Every candidate promises change. And yet it would be a greater challenge, verily an impossible one, to promise durability.

Change is inevitable. Indeed, the only constant in life is change. This is a cliché, a paradox that we take for granted and seldom truly stop to consider.

Life is a factory churning out change. Time’s chief function is to produce difference. It is up to human perception to ascribe value to the harvest of time, to determine whether this or that change is positive or negative — or both, or neither.

However, nature’s ruthless indifference suggests that there is no such thing as good or bad transformation. Furthermore, change as a process itself is ambivalent.

L Con with ciber1a, Ambient Music in the Park, 11 August 2024

Listeners gather for Ambient Music in the Park, 11 August 2024. Photographed for NicheMTL.

All the dreams and promises
That we give
We give away —INXS

Dream time differs from the experience of temporality in waking life.

We might sleep for only a few minutes and experience sprawling narrative dreams that seem to span over hours or even days.

Moreover, these dreams can feel convincingly real, altering our perceptions well into the morning, colouring our moods and shaping our interactions. What happens in a few seconds while we are asleep can have a lasting impact that resonates long after.

Which is the illusion: an instant or eternity?◼︎

Thank you for inviting NicheMTL to your thing. Please get in touch at the about page.

NicheMTL is Montreal’s independent not-for-profit source for this city’s most niche arts and culture. If you love what you’re reading, please consider subscribing.

Cover image: Antoine Saito for the Orchestre Symphonique de Montréal.

Standard
Play Recent

Reasonable Hand-Drawn Facsimile  

Soft Focus, Bradley Ertaskiran, Until 7 September 2024

Manual Axel Strain. Dawn transforms into siya (saskatoon berry) (2023), Bradley Ertaskiran, 11 July 2024. Photographed for NicheMTL.

In the early 1980s, there was nothing that I wanted more than a Cabbage Patch Kid.

Verily, I was the target market for this genius stroke of consumer product branding: I was a child in the early 1980s.

Every other 1980s child I knew had one, it seemed, and wanting to be like every other child, I hankered and desired and yearned for a Cabbage Patch Kid like no other item.

I wanted one like I wanted Christmas to come. I craved a Cabbage Patch Kid more than food. It was the first time I can recall developing something approaching an addictive impulse, needing that doll.

My dad didn’t want me to have one. He didn’t want me to play with dolls, I imagine, because he thought that in this world there were boy things and there were girl things, and decidedly, dolls were the latter. So, for a long time, I just quietly coveted other children’s Cabbage Patch Kids.

But my maternal grandmother, Margaret, knew how much I wanted this toy. And being a knitter, she took it upon herself to make me a Cabbage Patch Kid.

Out of a pair of thick old stockings, denim and yarn and buttons, she crafted for me a home-made version of this marketing phenomenon which approximated a Cabbage Patch Kid. As Cabbage Patch Kids all had names, Margaret gave my doll a name, too. His name was Flint.

I loved Flint, possibly more than I would have loved a Cabbage Patch Kid. Everyone else had a Cabbage Patch Kid, but no one else had Flint. Flint was even better than the real thing — singular, not mass-produced, in retrospect, more niche.

Looking back now, Flint is my Rosebud.

Good Sine, Cyber Love Hotel, 7 July 2024

From Left: Scott Bevins, Kevin O’Neil, Lisa Teichmann, and Luke Loseth perform at Cyber Love Hotel, 7 July 2024. Photographed for NicheMTL.

At a recent party, I had the good fortune to meet an actual practicing theoretical physicist. This man, whose name was James and was a spry 81 years old and in Montreal for an academic conference, appropriately gravitated towards my companion and me, lurking in the kitchen corner.

We struck up a conversation and I could immediately discern a higher level of intelligence and experience in James. His demeanour was calm and his sense of focus unsullied by the acceleratory pace of social media.

He spoke of concepts and ideas and told stories with gravitas and substance. He talked about Schrödinger and chaos and string theory and general relativity, fascinating us as a magician might with a coin trick.

I asked James if he believed that there were simultaneous, competing realities, and without hesitation, he said absolutely yes. He told us that the best answer that physics can offer to the nature of being is “probably.”

I shuddered and felt a tingle through my spine at that moment as I realized that I had probably stumbled into my own best possible competing reality.

Conflit Majeur, with Poor Girl, Shunk, and Puberty Well, Van Horne, 19 July 2024

Children dance while Shunk perform beneath the Van Horne overpass, 19 July 2024. Photographed for NicheMTL.

Quentin Tarantino’s 1997 film Jackie Brown, based on the 1992 novel Rum Punch by Elmore Leonard, features a scene in which the film’s main character, Ordell Robbie, whom Samuel L. Jackson portrays, details his dreams for the future. Robbie plans on amassing a million dollars in Mexico from his trade in the sale of illegal firearms and, as he puts it, “spend the rest of my life spending.”

This is a common theme of heist films — to steal or otherwise stockpile enough wealth to live out the remainder of one’s days free from labour’s obligations. To escape the work world, even if that work is crime, is the ideal goal.

Dennis Hopper’s 1969 counterculture classic Easy Rider reiterates this refrain.

In a scene where the film’s protagonists, Billy, played by Hopper, and Peter Fonda’s character, Wyatt, sit smoking marijuana around a campfire after selling an enormous stash of cocaine, Billy declares, “We’re rich, man. We’re retired in Florida now, mister.”

Wyatt replies, “No Billy, we blew it.”

“What?” Billy asks incredulously. “That’s what it’s all about, man, like, you know, you go for the big money, man, and then you’re free, you dig?”

Wyatt gazes into the flames and smirks and repeats, this time more forcefully, “We blew it.”

During an interview contained in the special edition DVD release of the film, Peter Fonda elaborates on this enigmatic response. He talks with genuine anger about people who aspire to retire. “I want to get right in their face and say fuck you man, there is so much work to do.”

Terra Flecta, SAT, 12 July 2024

Excerpt from videographer Emma Forgues and musicians Philippe Vandal and Joël Lavoie’s Terra Flecta. Captured for NicheMTL.

Thou shalt make thee no molten gods. —Exodus 34:17

Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they? —Matthew 6:26

The Torah speaks of a Jealous God who commands His disciples to worship no other deities but Him. The New Testament echoes this notion throughout, attributing false idol status primarily to money and pleasures of the flesh. True fearers of God must always be in the spirit rather than in the world.

This is a paradox — and, according to most faithful orders, the origin of suffering.

Humans are born with desire. As soon as we emerge from the womb, we cry, as if in anticipation of a lifetime of unrequited yearning. To want is to never be fulfilled. And yet we seem to need wanting.

This is The Place Where We Pray, Lara Kramer, Fonderie Darling, 18 July 2024

Lara Kramer performs in front of Fonderie Darling, 18 July 2024. Photographed for NicheMTL.

In Ernest Hemingway’s 1952 novella, The Old Man and the Sea, Santiago, an ageing fisherman, catches a fish so big that he has to tie it to the side of his boat to bring it ashore. But on the way back, sharks and other scavenging predators feast on the fish so that all that Santiago is left with is the fish’s skeleton.

This story is typically interpreted as a metaphor for human aspiration. The more we accumulate, the more we are apt to lose.

But taken from the shark’s angle, The Old Man and the Sea could be a holy book about an otherworldly entity — a sort of deity — who arrives in an unidentified seafaring object and feeds the masses.

It’s all about perspective.◼︎

Thank you for inviting NicheMTL to your thing. Please get in touch at the about page.

NicheMTL is Montreal’s independent not-for-profit source for this city’s most niche arts and culture. If you love what you’re reading, please consider subscribing.

Cover image: Sonya Derviz, Reclining, dreaming, (2024.) Charcoal and oil on linen, 160 x 200 x 2.5 cm. Photographed for NicheMTL

Standard
All Dressed

City Of Industry: in conversation with Caroline Andrieux

I find myself awkwardly telling Caroline Andrieux, the artistic director of the Fonderie Darling, amidst our meeting in the gallery that she helped to establish, about the contemporary phenomenon called “decay porn.”

Ruins photography, as it is sometimes less problematically labelled, is the artistic movement dedicated to the aestheticization of urban deterioration.

Abandoned factories, deserted construction sites, gutted shopping malls, rotting grain silos, defunct train stations, disused warehouses, crumbling interchanges — these non-places constitute ripe raw material for those with an eye toward the poetics of futures past.

Reclaiming the remnants of the industrial age is a post-modern form of gleaning, wringing out symbolic value from discarded sites of production. But I don’t need to teach Andrieux, who more than 20 years ago took over this majestic Old Montreal edifice and retrofitted it into one of the city’s most vibrant arts centres, anything about this.

“I was always fascinated by old buildings,” says Andrieux. “In 1997, ’98, another building that we were looking at — it was so beautiful. But it burned down. This area was a ghost village. It was like a game board. And it was also full of stories. It was a real miracle, in a way, that we saved this building.”

“I cross my fingers because it’s been difficult to get funds. But for now, we’re lucky enough to have them all sponsored.” Detail of the Darling Brothers Foundry from Éphémère Forever: 20 Ans de la Fonderie Darling, 2022.

Over the past two decades, Fonderie Darling has served as an invaluable workshop, exhibition space, and megaphone for countless artists at all stages of their creative lives.

Through partnerships with public funding agencies such as the Ministère de la culture du Québec and the now-nonexistent Ministère de la Métropole, and private industries like Bétons Lafarge and the Darling Brothers, the building’s original occupants, Fonderie Darling has managed to sustain the opposite economic model to most commercial art galleries.

Rather than representing artists and taking a percentage of their sales, Fonderie Darling instead pays artists to produce works of art in their adjacent ateliers and showcases them in the converted Foundry space, a cavernous three-storey arcade on Ottawa Street, right in the heart of Montreal’s most historic — and gentrified — neighbourhood.

“All the studios receive a sponsoring,” Andrieux explains. “So, artists don’t pay for their studios. They don’t pay rent. They have a grant to produce. And they have a lot of exposure because we work with them. We set up the best conditions for artists to launch their careers.”

There are currently eight Montrealers and four international residents working on-site with support from the Foundry. “I cross my fingers,” says Andrieux, “because it’s been difficult to get funds. But for now, we’re lucky enough to have them all sponsored for the past three years.”

Hailing from Hyeres, in the south of France, Andrieux was reared by her grandmother, an aspiring painter of Lebanese ancestry who married a French officer at the beginning of World War II.

“When the war was starting, she had to raise her kids by herself. So, she abandoned art,” recounts Andrieux. “But she was always painting at her place. Painting on Sunday. Even if I don’t remember very well, I remember the smell, and I remember her as an artist.”

Andrieux began taking drawing classes as a teenager and for a time entertained the notion of becoming a professional artist herself. “I was never happy enough with what I was doing,” she admits. Nevertheless, Andrieux soon discovered Art History and found her calling studying art as a discipline more than merely as a practice.

She completed a Ph.D. jointly through the Pantheon-Sorbonne University in Paris and Université du Québec à Montréal, writing her dissertation on the concept of the void in art. Andrieux focussed on a single work each from four New York artists — Agnes Martin, Gordon Matta-Clark, Yoko Ono, and Robert Barry.

“I chose Day’s End by Gordon Matta-Clark, which is a work he did on a pier in New York,” she tells me, “It helped me to understand why I’m so attracted to industrial buildings.”

Andrieux relocated permanently to Montreal in the early 1990s and founded Quartier Éphémère — an organization dedicated to recuperating some of the city’s most storied abandoned buildings as artists’ spaces — at the corner of Prince and rue de la Commune. Quartier Éphémère was responsible, for instance, for the legendary Silophone project, which turned the enormous Silo No. 5 on Rue Mill into a resonant echo chamber.

“I like the dialogue with the space. It can be in an architectural way, but it can also be in a posture.” Detail of Observatoire sonore, [The User], Silophone, 2001.

“There were all these buildings around us,” says Andrieux, “and there were still people working in them. I remember when I was walking to work at Quartier Éphémère, I was always the first person to walk the street in the morning.”

Although Fonderie Darling focuses mainly on contemporary artforms, Andrieux is intent on engaging with art history in general, and Montreal’s history, specifically. Its summer 2024 exhibition is entitled Black Summer ’91 and centres boldly on that particular season in this city.

Curated by Rito Joseph, an historian of Montreal’s Black cultural legacy, the show is a multidisciplinary project bringing together new works from five artists, as well as archival materials that document the events of that precise year.

“In 1991, it was still very difficult for a Black artist to exist,” says Andrieux. “People were pushed out of their apartments because of their race.”

Detail of Black Summer ’91. Photograph originally published in The Montreal Gazette, Saturday 27 July 1991.

Andrieux chooses her exhibitions carefully and according to instinct. “It’s really for the space,” she says. “I like the dialogue with the space. It can be in an architectural way, but it can also be in a posture. For instance, the space is very brutal and dominant. And we found that work that is very delicate and almost invisible has a power in the space. It’s interesting to challenge the space, but not to confront it. More to respond in a yin-yang process.”

I ask Andrieux if she considers curation as an artform, and she demurs: “It’s less courageous than being an artist,” she believes. “Artists are really courageous. But to make choices is the foundation of being an artist, I think. So, we are close. I think the real creative process is to transform your being into a life.”

No doubt, Andrieux has devoted her life to cultivating Montreal’s creative scenes in profound, meaningful, and long-lasting ways. It is unclear, however, if the whims of transient politicians such as the premier presently in power will spell ruin for Fonderie Darling’s survival in its current form.

“Quebec’s budget is affecting us a lot,” laments Andrieux. “We don’t know yet how much it’s going to affect us, but for sure, it affects all the artists. It’s very difficult these days, with two wars and a government that is totally ignorant. But wealth is not always money,” she says, wisely. “It’s also inside, in our spiritual self.”◼︎

Black Summer ’91 runs 20 June – 18 August 2024 at Fonderie Darling, 745 rue Ottawa.

Cover image: Caroline Andrieux photographed for NicheMTL.

Standard
Play Recent

Good Times Gone

Canadian Police and Peace Officers’ National Memorial Day, Alberta Legislature, 24 September 2023

I had occasion to be in Edmonton in September.

While there, I was fortunate to meet several members of the Ukrainian Canadian Congress. The Alberta UCC President, Orysia Boychuk, had just returned from Ottawa to welcome Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for his second diplomatic address to Canadian Parliament. Another tireless UCC volunteer, Cynthia Fedor, whose son is an RCMP officer, invited me that Sunday afternoon to the police and peace officers’ memorial ceremony taking place at the Alberta Legislature grounds.

Normally, honouring cops is not in my purview. I’m more like Hunter S. Thompson at a cop conference than anything approaching Jack Webb. My personal experience has been more ducking and running from cops than saluting them. But as time passes, and as violent incidents increase, I have come around to the police. I certainly have always respected their sacrifice to apply some semblance of order to a chaotic society. Not all cops are bastards.

In Zelensky’s speech to Parliament, he noted several times the need for what’s being called a “rules-based order,” upon which the world must function. We need rules. We need order. Order produces peace, on a local and global scale.

There’s no peace in a world where violence is more or less legal in this or that country, or where it is fine to exploit children in this or that region, or where nobody really pays any attention to what’s going on for an entire portion of the planet.

It’s one planet, it’s one-of-a-kind, and we need to start recognizing it as such. We have to begin to behave as if planet Earth is the irreplicable and irreplaceable home of life as we know it. Still for now, that’s what it is.

Everly Lux, Is It True?

Justice is incommensurate with capitalism because justice is inherently monopolistic. If we lived under true capitalism, someone would have come along long ago to deliver a fairer form of justice. Cheaper, too.

Catherine Lamb, Curvo Totalitas (2016), La Sala Rossa 2 October 2023

I missed Pop Montreal in its entirety this year. Not by choice, but by necessity. I’m still kicking myself. Happily, I was able to attend No Hay Banda’s season premiere, a more niche poptimism.

Valérie Blass, This Is Not a Metaphor, Darling Foundry, 8 September – 22 October 2023

Valérie Blass, This Is Not a Metaphor, photographed for NicheMTL.

Doubtless, the West is decadent. We’ve been decaying since the Enlightenment. Whether this is a permanent decline or just the low end of a sine wave that will arch back upwards at some point remains to be seen. Probably not in our lifetimes.

But there is no political or cultural alternative to decadence; only corruption of a different order, exploitation under another name. Putin is sleazier than Trump. Xi Jinping is sleazier than Putin. Kim Jong Un is sleazier than Xi Jinping. And the eye in the sky is sleazier than them all.

In the film Superpower, Sean Penn’s documentary about Zelensky, someone — a Ukrainian — says something like, “so long as there is corruption, there is justice.” Nowhere is that truer than in this great city, a rhapsody of virtue and vice, depravity and integrity.

To decadence.

Wu-Tang Clan

A common axiom goes, don’t meet your heroes. The implication is that our heroes will inevitably disappoint us because they could never live up to our heroic expectations. But there are two ways to cheat this. 1: Don’t have any expectations of your heroes; and 2: try to meet them when you’re least expecting it. Surprise them, too; don’t meet them where they’re normally met.

On Tuesday morning, I was walking along Rue de la Montagne with a colleague after a press conference at the Musée des Beaux-Arts. We had passed the entrance of the Four Seasons Hotel in front of which was parked a long, black tour bus. A tattooed and bearded and good-natured dude stood in front of the door, waiting.

I asked him who the bus was for, and he said, mysteriously, “my boss.” So I gently pressed him on who his boss was, and he said, RZA. I paused and confirmed that this bus was for the Wu-Tang Clan and he nodded with pride and told me that he was the RZA’s tour bus driver. He also told me that he would be right down and I might be able to say hello.

Moments later, there he was — the RZA, standing right in front of me. He had on his signature Carreras and looked fresh in a black velour track suit. I had nothing for him to autograph, and I didn’t much think to take a photo. I just introduced myself and said, ‘Mr. RZA, thank you for your music, and thank you for the teachings, which have changed — and possibly saved — my life.’

Mr. RZA responded with kindness and grace, thanking me for sharing the sentiment. He looked me in the eyes and called me by my name and bumped my fist. I’ve met many movie stars and musicians and wealthy people before, but none whose greatness was so immediately palpable, whose energy was so generous, whose aura was so contagious. I felt greater in his presence.

I still can’t believe that I was just walking downtown in Montreal on a Tuesday morning and almost tripped over one of Hip-Hop’s most brilliant and influential artists. I wasn’t lying. The Wu might be bigger than The Beatles. And they were bigger than Jesus. You can do the math.

And just as quickly, the boys were piling onto the bus, shuffling off to Buffalo for their next tour stop. So I wished them Godspeed and waved goodbye — and I might have accidentally slapped a NicheMTL sticker onto the back of their trailer as they pulled out and beyond the black horizon.◼︎

Standard
All Dressed

Permanent Waves: in conversation with Keiko Devaux

“The aesthetic theme throughout this opera is noise,” says Keiko Devaux over the crackling airwaves of a cellular telephone.

The Montreal-based composer and award winner, most recently, of the Juno for classical composition for her 2022 piece, Arras, is telling me about her latest production, a major new operatic work entitled L’Écoute du perdu, to be premiered across three performances at the Darling Foundry in February.

“It starts with the idea of turning a radio on. You’re lost in noise — the noise of space, the noise of silence — looking for a signal, and you tune into this signal.”

Devaux’s opera, co-presented with Group Le Vivier and Musique 3 Femmes, is something of a supergroup, too, a veritable who’s who of Quebec’s best and brightest talents, with mise-en-scène by the celebrated contemporary theatre director Marie Brassard; the Paramirabo Ensemble performing Devaux’s score under the conductor Jennifer Szeto’s direction; texts commissioned from the authors Daniel Canty, Michaël Trahan, and Kaie Kellough; sung by soprano soloists Sarah Albu, Frédérika Petit-Homme, and baritone Raphaël Laden-Guindon; Lucie Bazzo on lighting conception; scenography by Antonin Sorel; and with the legendary filmmaker and Godspeed You! Black Emperor member Karl Lemieux providing video imagery.

L’Écoute du perdu draws together a star-studded company and wrangling them is itself an impressive task.

“It’s my first big, ambitious, and really high-concept work,” says Devaux. “And being surrounded by such amazing artistic collaborators — I really mean it, sincerely. I was like, wouldn’t it be great if we could get these people? And then we got them.”

Devaux initially conceived of L’Écoute du perdu on the concept of wireless telecommunication, the rhythms of memory, and memory’s distortion via repetition.

“My whole doctoral thesis is about memory and its artistic and actual applications,” says Devaux, “so this is a theme that’s been running through quite a few of my pieces. My music, aesthetically, is very immersive. I knew immediately that I didn’t want a story, a linear story. I didn’t want a narrative. I wanted it to be based around different treatments of the voice, and because it was going to be based on memory, I didn’t want it to be one individual’s memory; I wanted it to have more of a universal appeal, a more fantastical appeal.”

L’Écoute du perdu is inspired in part by Devaux’s fascination with the Italian inventor Guglielmo Marconi’s most famous innovation: radio. “I’m kind of an amateur science geek,” Devaux admits. “I read about brains and different phenomena in nature and stuff, and it’s very evocative for me, musically. And I’d come across the story of Marconi, who believed that sound waves never die, and perhaps one day we’ll invent a machine that can tap into these sound waves. It was such an evocative idea and I thought, this needs to be a large-scale work.”

A delightful incongruity exists, though, between Marconi’s wireless radio waves, which are ephemeral, and our understanding of memory, a more permanent, enduring repository for the entirety of human experience. L’Écoute du perdu’s experimental form and structure emphasize this tension with at times bilingual and at times non-lingual passages repeated, looped, stretched, and their corresponding musical movements varied through reiteration and distortion.

“When I was reading about memory, I came across the idea of episodic memories, or ‘flashbulb’ memories, as they’re often called in pop culture,” Devaux elaborates. “Memories have strong emotional links to them. We play them back a lot because they help develop a sense of self. And the more you play back a memory, the more you distort it. And I thought, that’s so beautiful — and sad — this idea that the things that are most emotionally important to us and self-identifying to us are the things that become most distorted. I mean, we remember them vividly. We remember the smell of something, or how something felt. But then you forget what colour something was, or how many people were in the room.”

Yet Devaux’s work is memorable, indeed, and a packed house on opening night concurs. L’Écoute du perdu is a world-class compositional achievement adroitly weaving acoustic and amplified strands and sonic and visual elements together into striking aesthetic unity.  

“It’s not like an ‘oh, you killed my father’ kind of opera,” Devaux explains. “It’s a more subtle thing we’re working with. You are connecting to a sound that’s invisible in the air. You’re remembering something. It’s evocative. I didn’t really want coherence in a traditional way. I didn’t want to serve an audience a story. I wanted it to evoke a really clear emotional arc or narrative, and for there to be a tension between the audience and the piece in terms of understanding. I wanted for it to be really focussed on sensation and emotion, but not in an overly acted way. Just in the way the words and the music are treated. And I wanted it to have a high visual impact. It’s taken on all these different dimensions as all these different people come on and dialogue about it and add their artistic expertise. So, voilà!”

In spite of her magic touch, Devaux is gracious and seems especially indebted when discussing the collaborations and meaningful connections she has cultivated.

“There’s a difference,” says Devaux, “between people just doing a gig, doing it well and professionally, and people really being invested in the piece. And there’s this real feeling that everyone’s really invested. There was a lot of thought put into our conversations right away — talking a lot about the concept with the singers. Voice is so personal. I don’t know about you, but I can tell, even if someone’s amazing when they’re singing on a piece that they don’t really love, or that they don’t even really get. These three singers get it.”

That unmistakable sense of being tuned into another wavelength is at the heart of Devaux’s work. “Heightened emotion brings this sort of distortion,” she says, “and yet it brings at the same time this really intense sensorial vividness.”

Devaux takes a beat, laughing. “And I thought, oh, this is kind of how I feel about my music.”◼︎

Cover photo credit: Robin P. Gould

Standard